![]() ![]() Insta360 have spend a lot of resources developing a software ecosystem that’s perfect for 360 cameras and the EVO has full access to this. The livestream quality isn’t as good as the normal video quality, but the connection is pretty quick and reliable. Only the Vuze XR has a livestream mode which allows you to stream both 360 and 180 video directly to Facebook, YouTube and some other services. The Vuze is way ahead in terms of audio thanks to its multiple microphones which allows it to record ambisonic audio which creates a much more immersive effect when viewed on a VR headset. To be honest moving video isn’t particularly useful for shooting in 3D but it’s better to have the option than not! The Vuze on the other hand doesn’t do nearly as well with moving video, with only basic stabilization available. Insta360’s flowstate stabilization software is in full effect and and reliably smooth out moving video if you are walking or running. Without a doubt the Insta360 EVO is a much better camera for moving video. When shooting in normal mode the Vuze images look slightly better which indicates better lenses, however the EVO HDR mode allows it to create higher quality images. When shooting photos you get a similar story. 3K at 100fps does create a better slow motion effect but the resolution is so low that it’s not enjoyable to watch. When comparing these I found the 4K at 60fps to be the most useful and the best for creating slow motion video. Shooting in different frame rates is also an option in both cameras with the Vuze offering 4K at 60fps and the EVO offering 4K at 50fps and 3K at 100fps. As of right now there is no HDR mode on the Vuze XR but it maybe coming in a future software update. ![]() When comparing the EVO’s HDR video with the Vuze we can see a big difference HDR improves colors and dynamic range in a way that the Vuze is not capable of. One advantage that the EVO has over the Vuze is its HDR mode which can significantly improve the video quality. When watching in a VR headset I couldn’t see a huge amount of difference between the two and the 3D effect worked well in both cases. I mainly tested both cameras in their 180 mode as I feel that this is how people will use these cameras most often. To be honest the difference isn’t that big between the two and both videos end up looking pretty decent. When comparing the Vuze XR and EVO in the same location I found that the Vuze video is slightly more colourful but tends to overexpose bright areas more. Both cameras use fairly basic optics so don’t expect good performance in low light situations. The EVO video comes out at a slightly higher resolution but not enough to make much of a difference. Video and Photo Comparisonsīoth the Vuze and the EVO shoot 5.7K 360 and 180 video. Neither camera comes with a screen which is disappointing but both have manual controls to allow you to swtich between video and photo modes, as well as a shutter and power button. ![]() The EVO can’t really be used without a tripod or selfie stick and the plastic used in its construction feels cheap. The build quality of the Vuze feels superior and you are able to use it one handed thanks to the long body. The Mechanism for switching between 360 and 180 mode is quick and satisfying whereas with the EVO it can be a struggle. I find the Vuze XR to be a much better designed device, both in terms of looks and functionality. The EVO is a much smaller device comprised of two lenses that need to be moved manually. The Vuze XR is an elongated device with two lenses that automatically flip out into 180 mode at the push or a button. While these two cameras share an equal goal, to enable you to shoot both 360 and 180 video, they achieve it through a very different design. Insp, jpeg(can be exported via App), dng(RAW) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |